Devel of Oper Procs for Emergency Conds at Nucl Powerplants (IAEA TECDOC-341)
School of Humanities & Languages | Arts & Social Sciences - UNSW
Acronym and name. See Table 1 below for the list of formats defined. See Table 2 below for the list of purposes defined. This description is very brief; one is referred to the references for a more complete description.
These stages are: 1 Scope the assessment; 2 Learning the nominal operation; 3 Identify hazards; 4 Combine hazards into risk framework; 5 Evaluate risk; 6 Identify potential mitigating measure to reduce risk; 7 Safety monitoring and verification; 8 Learning from safety feedback. See Table 3 below for the list of domains defined. Methods with a domain that is underlined are found to be exclusive for that domain. For domains between brackets.. See also Table 4 for explanations. Note that the reference lists are not exhaustive.
The codes are explained in Part 3. Part 2: Statistics This part, which starts on page , gathers some statistics on the number of occurrences of elements in the table of Safety Methods, e. Part 3: References This part, which starts on page , gives the full list of references used. Also including rotorcraft such as helicopters. Electronic systems used on aircraft, satellites, and spacecraft, including communication, navigation, cockpit display.
Military, on land or in the air, including military aviation, weapon systems and nuclear weapon systems. Excluding military at sea. Navy, military at sea, including sub-marines Space safety, including spacecraft, satellites, space missions. Excluding aircraft, excluding avionics. Rail transport and operation of trains, including railway design.
Excluding manufacturing of trains. Road transport and operation of cars, including road design, tunnels. Excluding manufacturing of cars. Marine, maritime or inland water transport, e. Excluding navy, sea pollution, oil spills. Nuclear power industry. Excluding nuclear weapon systems.
Energy or electricity-generating plants, solar energy, windturbines, thermal power plants. Excluding nuclear power. Chemical industry and processes, including production of medicine, biochemical industry. Excluding food, chemical or petrochemical industry. Health care, hospitals, nursing, medical operations, biomedical issues.
Excluding production of medicine and other chemicals, and excluding ergonomics.
Environment safety, e. Ergonomics, i. Also including household safety Finance, banking, insurance, economics Management and organisation, including project management, information management, product management, marketing, operations research, logistics Security, i.
Excluding police and fire fighting Leisure and amusement industry, amusement parks, games, video games, media e. Electronics, electronic equipment, telecommunications, digital forensics Method has been applied to software design or analysis, but the industry sector in which the software is actually used is unclear or unspecified. No applications were found yet for this method, not even in an example illustration, so that the domain is currently unclear.
- Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry;
- Buy Education And Institutional Racism .
- How Things Persist?
There are a few approaches that are very generic and that have been used in virtually all domains. Table 4: Codes regarding Domain column: domain domain domain domain Found proof or strong indication that method has in fact been applied in this domain note that this proof is not necessarily provided in this document Ditto; method appears to be for use in this domain exclusively Found indication that the method is intended for application in this domain, but found no strong indication yet that the method has in fact been applied.
Protection of the Environment From Ionising Radiation
For instance, the method name refers to a domain, the method is mentioned in a domain-specific document, or an application of the method is a theoretical example. Ditto; method appears to be for use in this domain exclusively 3 Document control sheet Version Date Main changes Number of methods in database 1. Rigorous re-classification and update of Domain of all methods, now also distinguishing between method being applicable in domain versus actually applied in domain.
Addition of several new methods. Some similar methods are combined. Update of some details in other columns. Some references added. Description and classification of many methods improved.
Many new methods added, primarily identified as part of a project on safety methods conducted by NLR for the U. Federal Aviation Administration in For 32 methods, number and description removed, with reference to other methods. Update of statistics. Verification and update of all URLs in list of references and many references added. Introduction of a new classification type in column Purpose which collects Design D techniques, which are aimed at designing rather than analysing with respect to safety.
Descriptions of 19 new methods added plus 3 alternative names to already listed methods. New classification type introduced in column Purpose , which collects O Organisation techniques. This class now includes about 20 methods, most of which were previously classified as H Human performance analysis technique, five were previously R Risk assessment techniques; two were M hazard Mitigating techniques. Descriptions of 31 new methods added.
Alternative names or links to 49 methods included as separate entries in the table, with link to the original method, and without additional details provided. Details for one method removed and replaced by link to same method by alternative name. Minor details for many other methods updated.
Decommissioning of Nuclear Plants
One method added. Update of statistics and minor details of other methods.
- View Cliffs Notes On Angelous I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings 1992?
- Introduction to Lie groups and symplectic geometry.
- Fly Boy?
Textual changes and updates of other methods. Insert of statistics on database attributes. Textual changes and updates of all methods. Seven methods added, and for all methods an assessment provided of the applicable Safety Assessment Stages. Four steps: 1 Developing a Model — by defining a problem or situation in Excel spreadsheet, 2 Identifying Uncertainty — in variables in Excel spreadsheets and specifying their possible values with probability distributions, and identifying the uncertain spreadsheet results that are to be analyzed, 3 Analyzing the Model with Simulation — to determine the range and probabilities of all possible outcomes for the results of the worksheet, and 4 Making a Decision — based on the results provided and personal preferences.
The Eurocontrol 3-D collision risk model aims at providing a means for assessing the Level of Safety in European en route airspace, where controllers monitor air traffic by means of radar and provide tactical instructions to aircraft. A supporting prototype software tool analyzes recorded aircraft tracks from Radar Data Processing systems within a time span and a given volume of airspace, in order to identify all proximate events conflicts, potential conflicts, and potential collisions , classifies them according to various criteria, estimates the frequency of occurrence of these events, and determines the different parameters needed to estimate the probability of aircraft being on a collision course and the probability of air traffic control-loop resolution failure.
See also Monte Carlo Simulation. Applicable to aircrew. It assists in deconstructing the proposed change or system or accident elements that are later input to the structured identification of the sources, causes, hazards, and current and proposed hazard mitigation strategies related to the proposed change or system or accident.